Recently, a report on China's skyscraper released in Shanghai. The report listed names of the top-ten cities which ranked by the number of the skycrapers. Beijing, Hong Kong are among the top-ten. But some do not have the development of skyscrapers also want to build their own skyscrapers. Many people commented that the skyscraper is not the only indicator of urban competitiveness, blind development of skyscrapers is the wrong view of the embodiment of performance,building large number of skyscraper will have significant negative impact to the city's economic development. But some people think that the construction of skyscrapers to the city's economy will be enormous vitality, giving to vigorously promote economic development. In this regard, what do you think of it?作者: fangting 时间: 2011-6-14 10:29
If quantity and quality both well,maybe it can promote a city's economy and culture i think 作者: 吉祥猪 时间: 2011-6-14 21:42
Skyscraper doesn't mean everything.作者: yelix 时间: 2011-6-16 06:31
Skyscraper means nothing to the development of economy.作者: itsmypink 时间: 2011-6-28 21:49
the number of skyscrapers shows city developing fastly , at least in the former couples of years . but it doesn't represent industialization and moernization . it's just a number , not indicate much significant meanings .作者: itsmypink 时间: 2011-6-28 21:53
the typical example in china is the city named "e er duo si " in NeiMengGu province .
.gif)
.gif)
语言过激···