- UID
- 12794
- 帖子
- 8751
- 积分
- 11216
- 学分
- 55257 个
- 金币
- 800 个
- 在线时间
- 797 小时
|
手中无剑心中有剑,无招胜有招,返朴归真,直臻化境。不容易,咱还得用烤架放一把屠龙刀再加倚天剑,我不够聪明,没能找到里面的九阴真经和武穆遗书来横行天下。
最先我一直觉得作文拿7分是奢望,想想5分应该没啥问题,因而也就没怎么上心,移民需要的两门7分的目标就放在听和读上,主要时间也就相应花在听读尤其是听上,后来看完INSIGHT INTO IELTS两本书和FOCUS ON IELTS技能篇和读写篇后,觉得对雅思作文有了一定认识,况且自感无论是中文还是英文写起文章来还是能耍两下的,于是就参照网上有的作文高分者的推荐准备模板的意见,结合我前面所说的,即摘抄英语原文的好词好句,好开头好结尾,并总结各种连接词等,打算在考前整理出几个模板来。现在想来,这么做下去,考试时分题型把准备好的开头结尾往上一套,来个八股式文章,既能节约时间来润色词句,又能靠地道的开头或结尾来搏取考官的好感,也许真的就能弄到7分。
我上强化班时知道原先手下有个业务员2004年作文考了个8分,很是怀疑,我想他肯定就是这么准备的,事先准备好开头结尾和一些高分连接手段什么的,考试时按照题型不同,选择性地抄上相应模板,多点时间再润色词句,检查并避免拼写和语法错误,若考试考到练习过的题目,那高分就更没跑。我考试时没敢这么做,把已经写好的模板还擦了,原因前面说过一个,就是怕被判抄袭而得不偿失,批改栏确实与以前网上下载的不同了,除了评分栏还多出几栏,其中一栏标题就是吓人的“MEMORISED WORDS”;另一个原因,恐怕要因此被你们嘲笑,就是我当时尾巴翘上天,以为已经到了无招胜有招的境界了,用宋丹丹的词汇说就是“相当”自信,可以信手拈来皆成文章,结果这一来,学GZ只学了个皮毛,成了邯郸学步,也就失去了我现在反思的认为最重要的文章的流畅感,正如我上面说的,我还没能按照九阴真经练到所谓返朴归真,直臻化境的地步。看到网上有人已经总结如何准备模板的经验,我就不多费话了。
简言之,我认为一篇IELTS好文章,行文当注重:结构与内容,衔接与递进,词汇与语法。大家就自己体会这三者的含义吧,在此基础上适当准备附合自己行文特点的模板,也就是别楞穿裤头配西装打领带的意思,那样对考试的贡献还是很大的。
我这里为大家附上1月21日G类TASK2我写的6分文章吧,还有一篇我考前写的IELTS老师批改过的文章,部分应用了那本英国人写的词汇自测书上的内容,自认为且批改老师也认为是7分以上的水平,另外还有我整理的部分笔记,有一些错误我当时未予修改,供大家参考,建议大家平常准备就养成记笔记的习惯并能在练习作文时灵活应用。别忘了我们小时常听大人们说的一句教导:熟记唐诗三百首,不会作诗也会吟。
以2006年1月21日G类TASK 2 作文为例:
[要求]People now think that spending a lot of money is a waste of money. But others believe that these parties are important to the individuals and society. Discuss both views and give your own opinions.
[范文]
While the social and economic developments are significantly achieved, people get paid much more than ever before. As a result, they would like to spend a lot of money on their wedding or birthday ceremonies. What can we think about such a social phenomena?
Opponents claim that it is explicitly to not only squander money, but these expensive events would also give rise to negative impact on the community. As a developing country, we still need to rely on a kind of cost-effective lifestyle. In addition, these ceremonies would adversely affect the others in society.
However, advocates who are in favour of these parties maintain an opposite notion that people have no right to argue against it. Furthermore, it could be of great importance to both the individuals and society. To illustrate this, they take communication between people as an example. It is self-evident that inviting people getting together would provide them with a rare chance to talk with each other, which now is difficult for people in such a rapidly changing world.
In summary, it is not effortless to classify which kind of these parties people would be better to hold. In my opinion, keeping freedom and democracy is the most important. If you are wealthy enough, nobody has the right to say anything on your wedding or birthday parties.
只想起来这么多,PARA2好象还有两句论证句,与PARA3差不多长,实在想不起来了,总字数大约超过250字了。我错在TASK1花多时间了,写了快200字(20分钟)。 |
|